Overcast
64FOvercastFull Forecast

No pet limit for county

To the Editor:

McHenry County is considering a pet limit, which would be a mistake.

Has anybody else heard about the Minnesota case: Holt v. City of Sauk Rapids 1997? It’s a case in which a judge ruled that a pet limit law was unconstitutional.

Not only that, but passing a pet limit law only affects responsible owners, because owners who are truly irresponsible will ignore the law, instead of giving them to the Humane Society.

Should Animal Control come to their door, then the owner in question simply could hide his or her pets.

As long as a pet limit exists, the pets probably won’t receive medical care or vaccinations, because the owner would be too afraid of getting caught with too many pets to bring them to the vet. Worse yet, the owner could abandon them on the street, actually leading to an increase in stray animals.

The meeting at the Animal Control office Jan. 7 was a great example of what we need to do. We simply need to speak up, loud and clear.

Ben Szum Crystal Lake

Comments

Get breaking and town-specific news sent to your phone. Sign up for text alerts from the Northwest Herald.

More News

Comments

Reader Poll

How many times will you visit a haunted attraction this fall?
One or two
Three or four
Five or six
Seven or more
Zero