Fair
57°
Crystal Lake, IL
Fair
Forecast »

Is Illinois gun grab timed with fiscal ruin a coincidence?

Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

Call me paranoid, but I don't think it's happenstance that the General Assembly's attempt at a major gun grab is coming at the same time that it's driving us full speed into unfixable fiscal ruin.

After all, just because you're paranoid doesn't mean you're not being followed.

As a gun owner, my jaw hit the floor as I read about the details of a bill being sneaked through the House by eight Democratic state representatives aimed at significantly curtailing gun rights. It's one of three - products of Chicago Democratic legislators - aimed at gun ownership.

House Bill 1294 would make it illegal to buy, sell or own a "semiautomatic assault weapon" or any parts thereof (you can read it here). The public tends to not have an idea of what such a weapon is, thanks to decades of misinformation (unfortunately aided by sloppy journalism) from people who have never seen a gun, much less handled one.

All the public knows is that "semiautomatic assault weapon" sounds menacing, which is precisely the idea. Not to regurgitate the bill's specifics, but it makes a whole bunch of guns illegal because they have folding stocks, or magazines, or hand guards, or anything that makes the gun look mean.

(I can't wait for the bill making it illegal to own a car with a spoiler because it might lead to drag racing).

That bill, and a sister bill, House Bill 1599 (read it here), also re-classify a number of shotguns and handguns as "assault weapons" by the same arbitrary standards. House Bill 1599 has also cleared committee and is up for a vote.

A third bill, House Bill 1855 (read it here), would create penalties for gun theft - not for the thieves, but for the owners if they fail to report a stolen gun within 72 hours. As our outdoors columnist Steve Sarley wrote last week, you get robbed or burglarized and you become the suspect because you might have sold the gun instead. This bill has cleared committee as well, but its House vote has been postponed.

My feelings on these bills should be obvious, and I make no apologies - it's the Second Amendment that has protected my First Amendment right to a free press for two centuries. I prefer to call it a pro-Constitution bias.

Previous Page|1|||

Comments

About the Author

Kevin Craver

Senior reporter

Northwest Herald

Crystal Lake, IL

kcraver@shawmedia.com

Kevin has worked at the Northwest Herald since 2000. The Illinois Associated Press awarded his blog this year as the best news blog in the state for medium-sized newspapers. He has won more than 70 state and national journalism awards.

Follow this blog:

Get updates from this blog when they happen by following it on Twitter or using its RSS feed.


Reader Poll

What's your favorite campfire food?

s'mores
hot dogs
marshmallows
other