Overcast
73°
Crystal Lake, IL
Overcast|Forecast »

Tax levy
 divides District 2 candidates

Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

For more election news:

Full coverage of the election can be found at Election Central. See articles, profiles, video and more.

The McHenry County Board’s decision in November to raise the tax levy divides the five Republican candidates running for District 2.

The three incumbents – Ken Koehler, James Heisler and Donna Kurtz – voted to raise the levy to ensure the board captured the 1.5 percent increase it is entitled to under the tax cap. Their two challengers – Carolyn Schofield and Thomas Wilbeck – oppose the increase.

Five candidates are running for four seats in the March 20 primary for District 2, which covers northwest Algonquin and far northeastern Grafton townships, including parts of Crystal Lake, Lake in the Hills and Lakewood.

All 24 seats on the County Board are up for election this year because of redistricting after the 2010 U.S. Census. District 2 gained several more precincts in northeast Grafton Township.

The three incumbents defended their tax vote, which actually was a vote against not collecting the increase. They said that rejecting the increase would have jeopardized county government’s solid financial footing in exchange property owners saving between $4 and $8 a year on their tax bills.

Koehler, who has been County Board chairman since 2004, said the small increase helps ensure a balanced budget, addresses unfunded state mandates and funding losses, and uncertainties over the costs racked up by special prosecutors in their failed investigation of State’s Attorney Lou Bianchi.

“The majority of the board was in favor of taking the levy during budget discussions, and it was at the last minute that some changed their minds,” Koehler said. “Changing course the night before a vote and two weeks before the start of our fiscal year jeopardizes good fiscal planning.”

Schofield, a member of the Crystal Lake City Council, pointed out that the council decreased its levy by spending down the city reserve. She said the decision sent a message that government was serious about taking less in tough times.

“But lowering the rate for even one year acknowledged we understand people are having hard times, and just as they need to dip into personal savings the city responded by utilizing savings that have been acquired by the taxpayers,” Schofield said.

Previous Page|1||

Reader Poll

Do you feel you are saving enough for retirement?

Yes
No
Already retired