Fair
42°
Crystal Lake, IL
Fair|Forecast »

McCaleb: Pros and cons of wildlife refuge

Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

Creating a national wildlife refuge on thousands of acres of largely rural land might seem like a no-brainer to area environmentalists.

But nothing is that simple when the federal government is involved.

That’s why at least some environmentally friendly local residents are wary of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s proposal to create the Hackmatack National Wildlife Refuge on more than 11,000 acres in northern Illinois and southern Wisconsin.

The Bull Valley Association’s board, which is committed to preserving the environmental character and natural conditions of the village and its surrounding areas, is one group that does not want to be a part of the refuge.

“We think we do a good job locally of preserving and managing our land,” Bull Valley Association Vice President Tom Paulsen said. “Local control is better than management from afar.”

According to our previous reporting on this topic, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is considering creating the refuge to preserve and restore the natural habitat of area land because of the large number of migratory birds and endangered species that pass through and live here. The name of the proposed refuge, “Hackmatack,” comes from a Native American word for the tamarack tree.

When a refuge is created, public conservation areas fall under U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service jurisdiction, and the service begins to target private land for purchase. While private land owners don’t have to sell to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service if they don’t want to, at least some likely will.

And when this previously private land then falls under U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service control, it also falls under the refuge’s rules, which means new restrictions on land use.

For example, equestrian and snowmobile trails are significantly restricted in a refuge. In the grand scheme of things, that might seem relatively trivial. But if you’re a property owner who for years has used Bull Valley’s more than 80 miles of equestrian trails that cross in and through dozens of pieces of private property, it’s significant.

“Currently, the [Bull Valley] area has a large, connected equestrian trail system. In 85 percent of the cases this is made possible through agreements with individual private landowners,” the Bull Valley Association board wrote in a seven-page letter to its membership. “These permits would not transfer with title, leading to a fragmentation of the trail system, rendering it unusable over time. ... Their overall goal is to get horses off the refuge lands.”

Previous Page|1|||

Bull Valley Association letter

Comments


Reader Poll

Which gaming system do you own?

Xbox
Wii
PlayStation
other
more than one