Sitcom king Chuck Lorre collects cards for book

(Continued from Page 1)

Chuck Lorre – whose trio of hits includes “Two and a Half Men,” “The Big Bang Theory” and “Mike & Molly” – isn’t just a towering comedy mogul.

He’s also one of the most widely distributed writers in the world. His tart, often darkly funny dispatches reach a weekly audience of more than 30 million.

Granted, the number of people who actually read these tiny treatises is another question. Each of Lorre’s posts appears on-screen for a single fleeting second at the end of his shows, in the form of so-called “vanity cards” – a graphic ID for the show’s production company.

The “Chuck Lorre Productions” vanity card has been an outlet for Lorre’s random observations since 1997, when alert viewers of the ABC sitcom “Dharma & Greg” began noticing fine print on the screen which, by freeze-framing their VCR, they could dwell on long enough to read.

Among Lorre’s propositions on Vanity Card No. 1: “I believe that the Laws of Karma do not apply to show business, where good things happen to bad people on a fairly regular basis” and “I believe that when ABC reads this, I’m gonna be in biiiig trouble.”

As the years passed, Lorre kept issuing a fresh card for every episode of each show with his latest reflections, revelations and rants.

On one, he listed “words that confused the CBS censor” (a frequent object of his ire). Among them: kumquat, manhole, cunctation and Dick Butkus.

On another, he recalled a long-ago encounter with a 16-year-old guitar prodigy named Pat Metheny. It was a reality check that led to his eventually ditching his music career to “find work in television. Nobody’s a prodigy there.”

Now 333 of those musings – including a few that were censored by the network – have been gathered by Lorre in a rather magnificent coffee- table book, “What Doesn’t Kill Us Makes Us Bitter” (Simon & Schuster; $100), complete with lavish illustrations and even a sewn-in bookmark, a courtesy usually reserved for cookbooks and Bibles. (Proceeds will benefit Lorre’s Dharma-Grace Foundation, which supports the Venice, Calif., Family Clinic.)

In a foreword, Lorre explains his vanity-card mission has been “to use prime-time television to chronicle an unraveling life and raveling career in subliminal, one-second increments.” And with his output already available on his website, he decided the book should be graphically ambitious “in a desperate attempt to add value to something that was never intended to have any.”

Lorre may come across as wryly self-dismissive. But in a recent interview, he says he takes his scribblings very seriously.

“I started this because it was an opportunity to try and write prose, and I found it very satisfying, and very different than writing a script. This is much more personal. And at times,” he adds with one of his frequent whatta-ya-gonna-do? shrugs, “it’s gotten TOO personal.”

But Lorre insists the man once billed as “the angriest man in television” has found peace of mind.

“You need to get to know Chuck 2.0,” he says when past reports of Combative Chuck are mentioned. “I look around sometimes and I can’t believe all this has happened to a journeyman guitar player. Truly, I’ve been blessed.”

He allows that there was a time “when anger was the fuel to fend off other voices that wanted control of the creative process. I’ve never been a big fan of creation by committee: a committee of other comedy writers, yes; network executives, no.”

Now Lorre’s horizons are expanding further. He recently signed a four-year development and production deal with Warner Bros. that covers broadcast, cable and films. (Lots more reach for his vanity cards?)

But don’t think he’s renouncing the sitcom genre he is the undisputed master of.

“To make people laugh out loud, I think that’s a noble effort,” Lorre declares. “It’s worth doing. I’m doing the best I can. And I’ll try and be better.”

Previous Page|1|2|Next Page| Comments

Get breaking and town-specific news sent to your phone. Sign up for text alerts from the Northwest Herald.

More News

Comments

Reader Poll

Do you think law enforcement officers should be required to wear body cameras?
Yes
No
No opinion