Partly Cloudy and Breezy
77°
Crystal Lake, IL
Partly Cloudy and Breezy|Forecast »

Sarley: Readers side with hunter

Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

You may be wondering what the “Court of Public Opinion,” ruled in the case of hunter Ronald Mulholland of Des Plaines?

If you recall, the 72-year-old Mulholland was the man who shot what he believed were a pair of elk near Antioch. He did nothing legally wrong, as the Illinois Department of Natural Resources rules are that if there is no designated hunting season for a species of animal, then there are no restrictions on hunting it. In a recent column, I pronounced myself to be the “judge” and asked the readers to be the “jury.” I was flooded with responses.

Most responses made me out to be the villain in the story. Many readers were unhappy that I was against Mulholland’s harvest of the animals, which turned out to be red deer. I did write a column that explained what happened and opined that I thought the killing was wrong and asked the IDNR to change its laws to make all species closed season unless specifically mentioned. My second column where I appointed myself to be the “judge” was unbiased and allowed “testimony” from a hunting pal of Mulholland as a character witness before allowing Mulholland to have his unedited say. I think I was more than fair.

Here’s a little of what you, the jury, had to offer as an opinion in this “case.” Tedd Engel wrote, “Nice shot Ron, there that sums it up! People want a hot button? Concentrate on our politicians and what they want to take away – freedom!” 

William Dodson said, “Steve, you were completely out of line. It was mentioned these red deer were imported. Can you say for sure that these animals were inspected by the DNR for diseases that the animals could transmit to other wildlife? If it was ignored, the owner of the red deer should be charged and fined. Every one of those who condemn Mr. Mulholland need to apologize to him”

Al Widtmann added, “I was quite surprised that as an outdoor writer for the state of Illinois you were not fully aware of the laws governing the taking of game in Illinois. Most responsible sportsmen and sportswomen in Illinois can tell you that anything not covered under the Illinois wildlife code is ‘fair game.’ Ron may have very well done the people of Illinois a favor, as biologists have not studied the effects that an established red deer population may have in this portion of the state. There are other considerations as well. You do remember how CWD began, don’t you?”

Previous Page|1|||||

Comments


Reader Poll

Do you feel you are saving enough for retirement?

Yes
No
Already retired