Fair
56°
Crystal Lake, IL
Fair
Forecast »

Sarley: Readers side with hunter

Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

(Continued from Page 1)

Garry Hannigan added, “My opinion on the man killing the red deer was probably the smartest decision he made because Steve did you forget that that’s where CWD came from? That’s why the DNR wants them shot. 

Gentlemen, a lot of readers allege that CWD was introduced by the importation of nondomestic species but there is no proof to back that theory. And if the IDNR “wants them shot,” they should state so in the rule book.

Jason Kujawa says, “I believe you are completely wrong when saying that animals without hunting seasons should be protected and not able to be harvested. There have been confirmed wild hog sightings in the great state of Illinois. These animals are destructive to crops and our native animals. Protecting an invasive species as this would be foolish.”

Whoa, Jason! I am anti-feral pig, too. I just think they should be declared to have no restrictions on shooting them, just like coyotes are. Why one and not the other?

Dale Tollefson makes his point: “I think most hunters know it – feral animals are fair game. In the satellite of Ferncliff State Park’s Cypress Pond on the Johnson County side, there were a half-dozen cows loose where the state made grasslands. They were there for over 3 years and as far as I know they are still there. I saw those cows repeatedly. I didn’t kill one. To me that wouldn’t seem right. We cannot make a law for every right or wrong. Sometimes you just have to trust most people will do the right thing on a case-by-case basis. We already have too many laws.”

Sorry, Dale, I have a harder time every day assuming that people will do the right thing. True, we don’t need more laws, I am just asking for a change of one paragraph in the existing rules and regs.

Scott Jackson impressed me with his courtesy while disagreeing: “Your Honor, I would like to throw in my opinion on the Ronald Mulholland controversy. There are two species of animals that are predatory in nature which do not exist in Illinois that I do not want on my property and will not hesitate to shoot if one comes by – cougars and bears. I’m sure many fellow hunters would bash me extensively for holding this opinion. In my mind landowners should have the right to legally protect his property and assets from animals that can destroy his crops, soil, livestock, pets and children. Back in the 1990s there was an effort to possibly introduce elk in southern Illinois. That effort died because of complaints by private landowners of the damage elk would cause to the land. As far as Mr. Mulholland and his case is concerned, I see nothing moral or ethically wrong with what he did, and I will not criticize him for his legal choice.”


Reader Poll

What's your favorite campfire food?

s'mores
hot dogs
marshmallows
other