Health-insurance dilemma

Published: Tuesday, Nov. 19, 2013 5:30 a.m. CDT

To the Editor:

Mr. President and members of Congress, I have a question I need help with.

My wife and I, early 60s and in good health, have been informed that our insurance policy is sub-par and will need to be replaced. We like it, but we can’t keep it.

We have a policy with a $5,000 deductible and 50/50 co-insurance for the next $10,000 for a max out of pocket of $10,000. The premium is $4,351.56 a year, and our average out-of-pocket expense runs about $3,500 per year for the past three years.

Our new policy has a $6,350 deductible and then covers at 100 percent. It also covers mental health issues and maternity benefits, which I assume increased the premium. Doctor visits and medicine also will come out of the deductible first. The new premium is $1,321.58 per month – or $15,858.96 per year, an increase of $11,507.40 per year.

I checked on subsidies and discovered that if we earn $62,000 a year, we qualify for a subsidy of $1030.83 per month, which brings the yearly premium to $3,489. However, if we earn $65,000 a year, there is no subsidy.

Surely you understand our dilemma. Would you recommend we earn less and save the $12,369 in premiums, or try to earn more and pay the full bill? I’m sure we aren’t the only ones with this question.

As a final thought, please remember if we need to pay the additional premium we can’t print the money, and it’s likely to come out of other purchases.

Jim Cosgrove

McHenry

Get breaking and town-specific news sent to your phone. Sign up for text alerts from the Northwest Herald.

More News

Reader Poll

Have you ever written an online review for a local business?
Yes
No