65°FOvercastFull Forecast

Not a ‘bonus’

Published: Wednesday, Feb. 26, 2014 5:30 a.m. CST

To the Editor:

The headline of The Associated Press story published on Feb. 5, “Bonuses for Illinois public sector retirees cost millions,” describes a retirement benefit paid by Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund as a “bonus.”

The story also implied this “bonus” could have been used toward another purpose. Untrue on both counts.

Employees of local units of government provide various services and receive a salary, retirement program and, frequently, health insurance – similar to the compensation package for private-sector employees.

IMRF’s retirement program furnishes disability, retirement and death benefits. Part of this package includes post-retirement benefit increases to protect against the ruinous effects of inflation on retiree income.

Enacted in 1992, the 13th Payment was enacted when Social Security recipients received a 3.7 percent increase (Bonus?). It also came on the heels of a 10-year period where Social Security recipients received an average annual compounded 4 percent increase (Bonus?).

The AP story implied the monies used were diverted from more important services the unit of government could provide, but dollars levied to fund retirement benefits can be used only for retirement benefits. A unit of government may not shift the money from one pocket to another, then pay that money for other services.

So, when is a bonus not a bonus? When it is used to fight inflation as part of a comprehensive compensation package. This money also supports each retiree’s community. In 2012, IMRF pension payments generated $1.7 billion in economic activity in Illinois and helped support 12,344 jobs.

Louis W. Kosiba

Executive director, IMRF

Get breaking and town-specific news sent to your phone. Sign up for text alerts from the Northwest Herald.

More News

Reader Poll

Do you plan to vote in the township primaries Feb. 28?