Mostly Cloudy
69°FMostly CloudyFull Forecast

Walgreen turns down inversion to cut tax bill

Published: Wednesday, Aug. 6, 2014 5:02 p.m. CDT
Caption
(Steven Senne)
In this Wednesday, May 14, 2014 photo, a customer walks toward an entrance to a Walgreens store, in Boston. Walgreen plans to keep its roots firmly planted in the United States, saying Wednesday, Aug. 6, 2014 it will no longer pursue an overseas reorganization that would have trimmed the amount of U.S. taxes it pays. (AP Photo/Steven Senne)
Caption
(Matt Dunham)
People walk past the Boots flagship store, owned by Swiss health and beauty retailer Alliance Boots, on Oxford Street in London, Wednesday, Aug. 6, 2014. Walgreen plans to keep its roots firmly planted in the United States, saying it will no longer pursue an overseas reorganization that would have trimmed the amount of U.S. taxes it pays. The nation's largest drugstore chain said that, as previously planned, it will buy the remaining stake in Alliance Boots that it does not already own. It will not pull off an inversion, however, a tactic that has become increasingly popular with U.S. companies seeking tax relief, but which has sparked a backlash in Washington and among the public. (AP Photo/Matt Dunham)
Caption
(Matt Dunham)
People walk past the Boots flagship store, owned by Swiss health and beauty retailer Alliance Boots, on Oxford Street in London, Wednesday, Aug. 6, 2014. Walgreen plans to keep its roots firmly planted in the United States, saying it will no longer pursue an overseas reorganization that would have trimmed the amount of U.S. taxes it pays. The nation's largest drugstore chain said that, as previously planned, it will buy the remaining stake in Alliance Boots that it does not already own. It will not pull off an inversion, however, a tactic that has become increasingly popular with U.S. companies seeking tax relief, but which has sparked a backlash in Washington and among the public. (AP Photo/Matt Dunham)
Caption
(Matt Dunham)
People walk past the Boots flagship store, owned by Swiss health and beauty retailer Alliance Boots, on Oxford Street in London, Wednesday, Aug. 6, 2014. Walgreen plans to keep its roots firmly planted in the United States, saying it will no longer pursue an overseas reorganization that would have trimmed the amount of U.S. taxes it pays. The nation's largest drugstore chain said that, as previously planned, it will buy the remaining stake in Alliance Boots that it does not already own. It will not pull off an inversion, however, a tactic that has become increasingly popular with U.S. companies seeking tax relief, but which has sparked a backlash in Washington and among the public. (AP Photo/Matt Dunham)

Growing political heat and possible customer backlash helped dissuade Walgreen from trying to trim its tax bill by reorganizing overseas as part of an acquisition.

But experts say they don’t expect other companies considering the move to follow Walgreen’s lead and stay rooted in the United States.

Walgreen, the nation’s biggest drugstore chain, said Wednesday that it no longer would consider a so-called inversion, which has become popular among large, multi-national health care companies looking to cut U.S. taxes. The company said it will instead combine with the Swiss health and beauty retailer Alliance Boots to form a holding company that’s based in the U.S.

Walgreen Co. said in a statement that it was “mindful of the ongoing public reaction to a potential inversion” and its “unique role as an iconic American” retailer.

Walgreen’s decision follows a wave of recently announced inversions that have prompted President Barack Obama and members of Congress to voice growing concern about tax revenue the U.S. government could lose from these moves. Despite Walgreen’s decision, experts say U.S. companies will likely continue to pursue inversions because they can still reap big benefits by reorganizing overseas.

“We need fundamental corporate tax reform to solve this problem, and it isn’t going to happen in an election year,” said Donald Goldman, an Arizona State University professor.

Inversions involve a U.S. company reorganizing in another country by either acquiring or combining with another business. These deals provide tax relief in a number of ways. They allow companies to transfer money earned overseas to the parent company without paying additional U.S. taxes.

Inversions also provide some relief from the U.S. corporate income tax rate of 35 percent, which is the highest in the industrialized world. The U.S. had a competitive tax rate back in the 1980s but that changed when other countries started lowering their rates and the U.S. didn’t follow, said Cynthia Eakin, an associate accounting professor at the University of the Pacific.

“We haven’t paid attention to what’s going on globally,” she said. “We don’t really have a global tax strategy.”

There have been 47 U.S. companies that have put together inversions through tie-ups with foreign businesses over the past decade, according to the Congressional Research Service. Several others are planning or considering the move.

Walgreen was considering an inversion while it decided whether to buy the remaining portion of Alliance Boots that it didn’t already own. In 2012, the U.S. company bought a 45 percent stake in Alliance Boots, which runs the largest drugstore chain in the United Kingdom.

It ultimately decided against an inversion because the company wasn’t convinced the deal would pass IRS scrutiny. Walgreen didn’t design the acquisition as an inversion, so it would have to change key elements of it, including possibly the terms, to avoid IRS challenges that it was abusing the tax code.

An IRS fight could have led to a long legal battle and back taxes with penalties if the company lost, Walgreen officials told analysts during a Wednesday morning conference call.

Plus, the company had no assurances that tax code wouldn’t eventually be changed to remove some of the advantages companies get from inversions, spokesman Michael Polzin said.

Additionally, Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin had sent a letter to Walgreen CEO Greg Wasson urging him to reconsider an inversion and warning that the company may find its customers are “deeply patriotic and will not support Walgreen’s decision to turn its back on the United States.”

Walgreen deals directly with consumers more than other companies – like drugmakers – that have tried inversions. So, Walgreen would be more sensitive to public reaction.

At the same time, companies face growing political pushback. The Obama administration has urged Congress to act swiftly to curtail inversions, and Democrats in both the House and Senate have introduced bills to rein in the practice. But the election year push is unlikely to succeed in a divided Congress, where Republicans favor more comprehensive tax reform.

The political rancor may make some companies think harder about attempting inversions. But Goldman, the Arizona State professor, still expects companies to pursue them until either the corporate tax rate is lowered or the U.S. stops applying the additional tax to income earned overseas.

Walgreen shares sank more than 14 percent, or $9.88, to $59.24 in Wednesday afternoon trading.

The company’s stock had advanced more than 20 percent so far this year, as of Tuesday, and set several new all-time high prices. The most recent came on June 19, when the shares hit $76.39.

Previous Page|1|2|Next Page

Get breaking and town-specific news sent to your phone. Sign up for text alerts from the Northwest Herald.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Reader Poll

Are you OK with schools rather than law enforcement dealing with minor drugs and alcohol infractions by students?
Yes
No
No opinion